Logos Bible Software

LogosBibleSoftwareIn 1997 I purchased a software program called “Logos.”  That word is pronounced like “LAW-goss”, not “low-goes”.  It is the Greek word for “word.” and refers to the fact that it is a bible software program, the Bible being the “Word of God.”   I liked the software and used it, even though back then many of my friends were pushing me towards QuickVerse at the time.  When I became a pastor in 2002 I purchased the upgrade to their “Libronix” program, (along with a large amount of resources) which was essentially version 2 of their original program. I used this program all through my pastorate, and it was very helpful. Then I upgraded to version 3.  In 2010 I upgraded to version 4, because they said that if I upgraded, I would be able to access my library via my Bible app on iOS as well as their website biblia.com.  Both of these are very helpful, and I’m glad I upgraded at that point.

I think it was last year they started telling me I should upgrade to version 5, because it was faster, better, etc than version 4.  I held out, because in truth I don’t use the program very much in my work as a nurse.  It’s more for personal use, and for when I teach the odd Sunday school class or Wednesday night service.  But in April I caved and upgraded to the Bronze level of version 5.  In doing so, I have paid more money, but I can detect no noticeable difference from version 4. Just last week they announced version 6, which is supposed to be even better. The only consistent feature of these upgrades is that they get money out of me.

I looked at the new system, and there’s only one benefit I can see: they are including the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia in the base package.  This means that if I wanted to get rid of the four giant volumes on my bookshelf and buy the digital version, I can either pay them $80 for the ISBE resource, or I can upgrade to Logos 6 for $80.  Well I don’t have $80 right now, so I’m going to hold off until I do, but I got an email today from Logos with glowing reviews of their new version, and it prompted me to write my own review.  Here it is:

You want a product review? I use Logos about once a week to read books that have been published for years or (in most cases) decades or centuries. Every time I open the program it wants to download an update. Then it wants to spend time indexing, installing the update, restarting, indexing again, and generally takes me about five minutes to get it to where I can start using it. My computer is not slow. Just so you know I have a PC with an i7-3630QM CPU at 2.4 Ghz and 8gb of RAM. This should be more than fast enough to run Logos, and yet the indexing, installing, and restarting takes about five minutes for some reason, when all I want to do is look up a Bible verse or read a section of a commentary. I don’t know why it takes five minutes to download a 50 megabyte update, because my connection speed is about 20 megabits per second. According to my math, a 50 megabyte update should take approximately 20 seconds.

The funny thing is that your website biblia.com and the “Bible!” iOS app are more helpful to me than your actual program, because they provide instant access to my resources. I upgraded to version 5 this spring with the expectation that this would make the program faster, but it didn’t. I can see no noticeable change, and the main reason I upgraded was to get access to a Hebrew Interlinear Bible, which I was promised when I upgraded, but still have not received access to.

For your information, I opened Logos the moment I started typing this email. It’s been 11 minutes, and now it’s going to start indexing. I’ll let you know when it’s done, and how long it takes.

I wish I could give a positive review for your product, but the ease of use doesn’t really allow me to do so. It’s like you sold me a really good car that has all sorts of features, but you have to start the car and let it sit there for 20 minutes before you can ever put it in drive: not practical or particularly useful. 16 minutes now and indexing is 25% done.

I do like the program once it gets done with the preliminaries, but if I could go back, I would have simply stuck with Logos 4, which allowed me access to the books via your iOS app, which is the last positive benefit of upgrading I have experienced. 17 minutes 30 seconds and we are 33% indexed.

Another problem that I’ve been having is that on my iPad, when I open the Bible! app it now includes the footnotes, which take up a large percentage of the bottom of the screen. I would like to go back to the old way, where I could tap the footnote indicator and read the footnote as a popup instead of viewing all the footnotes at once, but I don’t see any option to hide the footnotes. In other words, I’d like the app to be more customizable. 20 minutes in, 45% complete.

It just finished. 25 minutes after I started your program, it is fully updated, indexed, and ready for me to do a bible search for “patience.”

This is the message I get when I try to open the program.

Tell me about it.

Do I recommend Logos? Yes.  But as I said, it has issues.  I would give it three out of five stars.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Color Me Apathetic

I was torn between the title for this post that I ultimately chose and the alternate “Six of One, Half-Dozen of the Other.” You, the reader, can tell me if I made the right choice.

If you listen to the Democrats (minus Joe “Whistling in the Dark” Biden), today is the day of doom. The day that the Democrats will almost certainly lose control of both houses of Congress, ensuring utter destruction for at least the next two years until the country comes to its senses again, and votes them back into office.

If you listen to the Republicans, today is the day that we retake Congress from the hands of those who shoved Obamacare down our throats, waffled on immigration, and allowed the President to do pretty much whatever he wanted.

I submit to you that, Republican or Democrat, today will largely be the day that follows yesterday. That’s pretty much the whole significance of the thing. Why do I feel this way? To paraphrase my friend Steve Deace (because I can’t find the actual quote), “Before America tries a three party system, we should try a two party system first.” He was saying that there really isn’t much difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. They talk a big game, but most of them are only interested in two things:

1. Getting to Washington DC.
2. Staying there.

I’ve heard some Republicans rejoicing at the forecasted Republican takeover of Congress, which means, according to them, that we will finally secure the borders, stop illegal immigration, repeal Obamacare, end abortion on demand, etc, etc, etc. To these people, I have one question:

Why didn’t the Republicans do those things before?

They controlled the White House for 8 years (2000-2008). They controlled the House of Representatives from 1994-2006. They controlled the Senate during those same years, except for two years in 2001-2002 when Jim Jeffords, RINO-NH, gave control of the Senate to the Democrats. What does that mean? It means that for FOUR YEARS the Republicans held both the Executive and Legislative branches, and for TEN years they held both houses. Did they solve the illegal immigration problem? No. Did they balance the budget? No. Did they decrease the federal debt? No. Did they end abortion on demand? No.

The Republicans have even controlled the House of Representatives for the past four years. DO you know how many bills the House has passed in the past four years to repeal Obamacare? 54 times (knowing these bills would die in the Democratically-controlled Senate, making them largely symbolic). Do you know who is in charge of what gets spent in this country? The House. Do you know who voted to fund Obamacare for the past four years? The House of Representatives. So they could have defunded Obamacare, but they didn’t. They tried, I’ll give them that, but when the Senate threatened government shutdown, the Republicans caved.

You see, when liberals defend their position, it’s called principled leadership. When conservatives defend their position, it’s called partisan bickering. The siren call of “bipartisanship” draws the Republicans onto the rocks every time.

So excuse me if I don’t get giddy when, tomorrow at this time the news agencies announce that this January Harry Reid will give up his gavel to Mitch “Bad Votes” McConnell.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LED Light Bulbs: Get Some!

A week ago I attended a talk by Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson at the University of Indianapolis. He discussed current events in science generally, and astrophysics specifically. He was very entertaining, and I enjoyed the lecture immensely. He only mentioned evolution during the Q&A time at the end when someone asked a related question.

But one thing he said stuck with me. He was talking about how the United States is lagging behind other countries in science innovation. As an example he mentioned the three men who won the 2014 Nobel prize for Physics: Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura. Notice anything about those names? Dr Tyson’s point was that they are Japanese, and the Japanese (and Koreans) are outpacing us in science innovation by leaps and bounds.

But that’s not why I am writing this blog post. My post has to do with the REASON they won the Nobel Prize, specifically, “”for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light sources”.”

You see, when they came out with these Compact Fluorescent monstrosities, I was alarmed, because they said, “To improve the environment, you need to stop using those light bulbs made from glass and carbon, and start using glass and poisonous mercury. For the environment.” I didn’t want the things in my house. “But they’re more efficient” they said. “They’ll last longer” they said. Phooey on you, I said. I don’t want to have to call the EPA every time I break a light bulb.

But here is the answer to that problem: LED light bulbs. They use a fraction of the energy, save money over time, and are better for the environment. Dr. Tyson asked us all, “Does anyone here not have LED lights in their home, raise your hand. You’d better not raise your hand. Get your butt out there and get some! These are highly efficient sources of light, they give off hardly any heat, and they discovered it.” Evidently the invention of blue LED allowed scientists to develop white light LED light bulbs.

I had never heard of LED bulbs. After I got home I did some quick research, and found out that, while an LED light bulb is way more expensive than an incandescent bulb, it is also way more efficient and way longer lasting. The average incandescent bulb lasts about 1200 hours and will cost you $328 per year to keep lit. The average LED bulb will last about 50,000 hours (41 times longer) and cost you $32 per year to keep lit.

Today we bought our first LED bulbs. The bulbs do cost more. We paid about $6 for one bulb to put in our front yard (our HOA demands that each house have a security light post with a light bulb and a light sensor so it stays on all night). That light is on 10-12 hours every. Single. Night. And now my electric bill is going to go down. As we replace more bulbs, the bill will go down even more. As the following chart shows, these bulbs are more efficient, more durable, and better than the incandescent bulbs.

LED Bulb chart

One correction: this LED bulb now costs $6, not $36, so it’s even better!

Their only drawback: they probably wouldn’t work anymore if you ever got hit with an EMP. So, barring nuclear war, LED is the way to go!

If you see this, your light bulbs will be the least of your problems.

If you see this, your light bulbs will be the least of your problems.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

This Video is Made From Walking

There has been some fuss about the most recent viral video today. A woman decided to walk around the streets of New York City for ten hours, videotaping the whole thing, and then upload the results (the actual video is only 2 minutes long). She encountered a couple of creepy guys, but I watched the video, and I don’t think she got enough evidence to support that street harassment is an epidemic. Granted, I’m not a woman, and I’ve never had to deal with people hitting on me, but from my perspective, there are several problems with her assertion.

First of all, I have to say again that I am so tired of seeing these viral videos attached to words like “Jaw-dropping,” “Shocking,” “Amazing,” or phrases like “will change your mind” “will blow your mind,” etc…  Most of these videos are either cute, funny, or interesting, but nothing like they are described.  Calling the mundane wonderful gets annoying after a while.  It’s like you meet your friends for lunch, and they keep handing you store brand cookies and telling you they are “the absolute best cookies ever!!!” or eating a McDonald’s cheeseburger and being told the flavor combinations “will blow your mind!!!”  Just stop.

Back to the video at hand.  Not every person in the video could be described as displaying harassing behavior. Several people simply greeted her. It’s hard to accuse everybody in that video of lecherous behavior. That being said, some of them were definitely harassing her.

One observation I have to make: it’s New York City. I went there in 2006 and the only people who spoke to me were people to whom I gave money. Most people there are anti-social by nature. In other words, if you saw someone you were interested in getting to know, simply smiling at them is not going to be enough in NYC. They would continue to ignore you. In Iowa, if you don’t greet someone, you are looked on as rude. The opposite is true in NYC.

Finally, while a few guys in the video were creepy or pushy, some of them were just being friendly. We live in a world where the motivation of the man talking to a woman is determined by the woman receiving the message, NOT the man sending the message. In other words, if I say “hi” to a random woman, our society says it’s HER right to say if I am harassing her or just being nice.

The other thing that hasn’t been mentioned in relation to the fact that this was filmed in New York City was that this woman encountered FAR MORE people in her ten hours of walking than would be normal across the country. I’m guessing she probably went through the ten hours of video and included the worst offenders in her video. Even given the fact that that half of those people were just saying “hi”, I’d say that two minutes of examples out of ten hours of walking in NYC is pretty good. It has been estimated that about 7000 people per hour walk past certain spots in NYC. Given the fact that she was walking, we should be safe to cut that number in half, estimating that half of those people were walking the same direction she was. So that’s 3500 people per hour. In ten hours, that means she encountered approximately 35,000 people. Let’s assume for now that half of them were women, and let’s further assume the women were not interested in her. That means that in ten hours she encountered approximately 17,500 men. How many of them “sexually harassed” her? “more than 100 instances of verbal street harassment.” Let’s ignore the fact that several of these men were simply saying hello. Let’s go ahead and assume all 100 were lecherous individuals.

That means that 0.05% of the men she encountered (0.025% of the humans she encountered) were perceived by her to be sexually harassing her.  That means that out of every 175 people she encountered, one was creepy or talked to her.  I know some of you are visually oriented, so here’s a graph to display her experience.


Another thing, not one of these people touched her.  I think that’s significant.

Des Moines has about 207,000 people, whereas New York has 8.4 million. That means that it would take 40 Des Moines cities to fill NYC. This means that if she had walked the streets of Des Moines for ten hours, she would have only had 2.5 of these interactions. Considering that half of the people in the video were simply saying hello, this means that if she had walked in Des Moines, ONE PERSON would have hit on her, statistically speaking. It would probably have been the guy walking next to her for five minutes. What a creeper.

Personally I believe her assertion that street harassment is a huge problem is overblown.  Does it exist?  Yes.  Do we need to pass laws about it?  I don’t think so.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lesson Learned

I learned my lesson today. I had some textbooks that I don’t need, so I listed them for sale on Amazon.com. Two of the books sold, and we shipped the first one via USPS on September 25th. They didn’t pay for tracking, so I didn’t ask for it. They didn’t pay for delivery confirmation so I didn’t ask for it. And I didn’t save the receipt.

I think you know the rest of the story. I started getting e-mails a few weeks ago: Where is my book? I paid you but still have not received it. Etc. Etc. I reassured the buyer it was in the mail, but according to her, she never got it.

This means logically that one of two things happened:
1. The United States Post Office lost my package, or is taking their own sweet time (almost a month now) to deliver it
2. She received the book, and is lying so she can get her money back and have a free book.

While both of these are possible, in the interests of good will I assumed the first to be true, and refunded her money. If I had gotten delivery confirmation, then number 2 would be impossible, since I could prove she received it. If I had saved the receipt, I would have the tracking information so I would be able to tell where it is (hopefully). A month ago I had a $20 book. Then I had $20, and she had the promise of a book. Now she has her $20 back, and I have no book.

Next time I will get delivery confirmation and save the receipt with the tracking information. Because those are for me, not for the buyer.

Live and learn.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

City of Houston Rejects Freedom of Speech and Religion.

I have said before that the gay rights activists do not want to be left alone. They want acceptance of their lifestyle. They want approval that their sexual choices are not only “not-wrong” but that they are actually morally correct. I even alluded to the civil prosecution of those businesses who declined to participate in the homosexual agenda. But it has gone beyond that now. I have referred to the gay rights lobby as the “gaystapo” (which is a portmanteau of “gay” and “Gestapo,” the Nazi secret police). I refer to them as such because they are acting like the Gestapo, forcing people to “toe the party line” so to speak.  And amid the many examples of this today we have the worst case so far, from the Lone Star State.

In Houston, Texas, it is now illegal to speak out against homosexuality. Those of you who think that this isn’t a bad thing, let me remind you about a thing called the “First Amendment.” Here is the text:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

What Houston did goes directly against two of the six clauses in this amendment: Freedom of religion and freedom of speech. And then they even rejected the sixth: the right to petition for redress of grievances. Let me give you a timeline of the events surrounding this case, and how it led to this unconstitutional act by the city of Houston.

May 28, 2014: The Houston City Council passed the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (aka, the “Bathroom bill”), or HERO, in an 11-6 vote, whereupon it was promptly signed into law by Mayor Annise Parker, a lesbian. Why do I bring up her sexual orientation? Because she has stated that the HERO is, “all about me.”

July 3, 2014: Opponents of the HERO turned in a petition with over 55,000 signatures from residents of Houston who want to repeal the bill. The opponents only needed 17,269 signatures. The petition would move the issue to a city-wide referendum to be added to the ballot in November.

August 4th, 2014: Mayor Annise Parker (lesbian) and other city officials stated that there were “too many irregularities among the signatures,” thereby rejecting the repeal request. They threw out whole pages of signatures, bringing the total down to 15,249, a mere 2,020 signatures short. This means they threw out about 40,000 signatures.

August 5th, 2014: The opponents of the HERO filed suit in state court to have the signature verification process reviewed.

August 6th, 2014: The City of Houston removed the suit from state court and sent it to federal court, a move that could affect the outcome in their favor, since the state of Texas is more conservative than the federal courts.

August 7th, 2014: US District Judge Gray Miller remanded the suit from federal court back to state court.

September 10th: The City of Houston issued subpoenas to a number of Houston-area pastors, in which the pastors are required by law to turn in any communications they have regarding the HERO, including, “All speeches, presentations, or sermons related to HERO, the Petition, Mayor Annise Parker, homosexuality, or gender identity prepared by, delivered by, revised by, or approved by you or in your possession.” In other words, if pastors have spoken out from the pulpit against homosexuality, these pastors must turn those sermons in. (Full text of one of the subpoenas here.)

So you see, we’ve come to the point where churches are being forced by the government to surrender any and all materials in which they spoke out against homosexuality. I don’t know how this situation is going to be resolved, but I will say that it is merely a symptom of the future in this country. I foresee a time in which churches that openly affirm biblical morality (including the proscription against homosexuality) will be forced to close. We’re not there yet, but this situation in Houston tells me that the people who want us to get to that point are here already, and they are gaining strength.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Arguing With Heathens

Arguing with people on the internet, especially unbelievers gets frustrating because I make a statement, and then five people respond with their arguments that prove I’m an idiot. It’s difficult to respond to all of them, and sometimes the arguments they bring are simplistic, showing they have almost zero Bible knowledge. Sometimes their arguments are old and worn out. But what happens without fail is that while I am formulating my response to one of them, another bunch of people chime in. And if you don’t respond to their comment, they think they have “won” by stumping you.

It’s a struggle to know when to “earnestly contend for the faith” (Jude 3) and “be ready always to give an answer to every man that asks you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear” (I Peter 3:15), and when to stop “casting pearls before swine” (Matthew 7:6).

But there is one argument that I encounter over and over. I know that if I mention the Bible in any public forum, someone will drag this thing out like Exhibit A at a trial and thrust it in my face with a look of triumph on their face, saying, “Oh yeah? What do you have to say about THIS?”

What is the argument? It can be summed up in this statement: If you say you follow the Bible, then why don’t you keep the Mosaic Law?

This argument is always foreshadowed with a seemingly innocent question like, “Do you eat bacon?” “Do you wear cotton-polyester blends?” These are questions that, if the person being questioned was unfamiliar with the Law of Moses, could really trip him up.

Just today on a Facebook forum a man asked me, “Why don’t you have a full beard like the Bible dictates?” I actually laughed as I responded, “But I DO have a full beard.” Another person on the same thread pointed me to a buzzfeed article (note: if you are using buzzfeed to defend your position, you’ve already lost) which details 19 things the Bible forbids other than homosexuality. It goes on to list a bunch of Levitical restrictions that don’t apply to Christians. Burrrrrrn!

Finally, after enduring these theological mistakes all day, I read a comment from a girl who asked me,

“Steve do you work on Sundays? Leviticus speaks about death for this. Do you eat shrimp, lobster, or other seafood? This is an abomination…same wording as man lying with another man, yet nobody is so vehemently against that. Women that lose their virginity before marriage should be taken to the door of her father’s house and stoned to death. I have a feeling you don’t agree with the things I have mentioned above, so you’re picking and choosing from the bible to suit your own opinions. Don’t claim to only be listening to the word of God if you’re going to decide one part matters, but we can ignore the rest.”

Here is my response to her:

I see where you’re going, and let me help you out.
1. Yes, I work on Sundays sometimes, because I’m a nurse, and sick people don’t suddenly get better at midnight on Saturday night. I know what you are trying to say, that Leviticus says I shouldn’t work on the Sabbath, but you should know first of all that Sunday is NOT the Sabbath. The Sabbath is Saturday.
2. No, actually, I don’t eat shrimp, lobster, crab, or other seafood. But it’s not because of Leviticus. I just find them all disgusting. I eat fish (whitefish like cod, halibut, etc; tuna, and a few other types).

Basically what you are saying is that since I believe the Bible is the Word of God, that I should obey everything in it at face value with no kind of interpretation. This is asinine. God had rules for Adam and Eve that He didn’t have for Abraham (“Don’t eat that fruit!”). He had rules for Methuselah that He didn’t have for Abraham (“Don’t eat meat!”). He had rules for Abraham that He didn’t have for Moses (“It’s ok to marry your sister”). And of course, my point is that He had rules for the Hebrews that He doesn’t have for me (“no lobster, no working on sabbath”). You see, if you bothered to READ the Bible and attempt to understand it in context, you would see that the things in the Old Testament were written for an example for us. There are many places in the New Testament where it states that followers of Christ do not have to keep the Mosaic Law. However, there are parts of the Mosaic law that reveal to us God’s morals. For instance, even though the NT says I don’t have to follow the Mosaic Law, this does not allow me to break the command in Exodus 20:13 “You shall not murder.” I think we can both agree that murder is still wrong. As a matter of fact, there are places in the New Testament that state murder is wrong. And so it is with lying, coveting, adultery, idolatry, and yes, homosexual behavior. The prohibition against all of these is repeated in the New Testament, no matter how much Matthew Vines wishes it weren’t so.

I am not “picking and choosing” as you say, I am interpreting the Bible with a dispensational hermeneutic, to use the theological terminology. I’m sorry if that is beyond your grasp, but it is the best wording for my beliefs about the Bible which I have attempted to explain.

See, the problem here is that people treat the Bible as if it is a theological “how-to” manual that is 100% applicable to me in a literal sense. In other words, I should do everything it says. But if that were true, I would have to (at the same time) present a sacrifice of animals at the Temple in Jerusalem (kind of hard because it’s not there anymore but hey…) AND trust in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ as a complete covering for my sins. In Leviticus chapter 4 God outlines the sin offerings. In verse 35 He states that by sacrificing an animal on the altar, a Hebrew could be forgiven. However, in Hebrews 10:4 it says “For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” Which is correct? Does the Bible contradict itself?

No. As I stated above to the woman Facebook poster, God had different rules for different people throughout the history of the world that don’t apply to people in other times. But the way to salvation has always been the same from Adam all the way to the last person born in the Millennial kingdom in the future: trusting in the death of the Son of God as the perfect Sacrifice to take away the penalty of your own personal sins. If Adam is in heaven, it’s not because he sacrificed animals. It’s because he was trusting in God’s future sacrifice of His own Son. When God allows me into heaven, it will be because I am trusting in God’s past sacrifice of His own Son. If my great grandchildren go to heaven, it will be for exactly the same reason.

Dispensationalism simply means that God has certain rules for certain groups of people at certain times. Evidently Noah wasn’t supposed to eat meat before the flood, but in Genesis 9:3 Noah is told it’s ok. Interestingly enough, God tells Noah in that verse “Every moving thing that is alive shall be food for you; I give all to you as I gave the green plant.” So Noah was allowed to eat pork, a non-kosher food (tip: Noah wasn’t Hebrew). And yet later on God said “Don’t eat pork” to Moses and the Hebrews. And yet later on God told Peter in Acts 10 that pork was ok again.

So the next time someone trots out this old dirty sock of an argument, you will know that they are misinterpreting the Bible, and perhaps you can enlighten them that just because God told the Israelites that bacon was not ok, this doesn’t mean God thinks bacon is bad, He just had different rules for them. And though He had different ceremonial laws, His moral law is unchanging: lying is sin. Murder is sin. Idolatry is sin. Disrespecting one’s parents is sin. Adultery is sin. Fornication is sin. Homosexuality is sin.

The biggest error that people make in these debates is in thinking that they are the arbiters of morality: THEY are the ones who decide what is right and what is wrong. This is the lie of Satan from Genesis chapter 3: you will be as gods, knowing good and evil. Humans tend to think that we get a say in deciding what is right and what is wrong. Well, we don’t. God says what is right and wrong, and He tells us so in His Word. So if God says don’t do it: don’t do it.

Finally, the Bible is not a to-do list where you can read a random passage and simply apply whatever it says to your life without understanding who the passage was written to, the meaning of the passage, etc.  In other words, you have to interpret what you read.  Otherwise you end up like the guy who decided he was going to open his Bible to a random verse and do whatever it said.  He closed his eyes, let his Bible fall open, put his finger on the page, and looked at the verse. It was Matthew 27:12 “…he departed and he went and hanged himself.”  The man thought, “Maybe I’d better double check to make sure this is God’s will.” So he did the procedure again, and when he opened his eyes, his finger was on John 13:27, “…Therefore Jesus *said to him, “What you do, do quickly.”

Don’t cherry-pick verses.  Read the Bible in context and interpret it to determine the meaning.  If you are saved, then the Holy Spirit will illuminate it for you.

And don’t worry if it seems like nobody is listening.  The act of standing up for God is worth it all on it’s own, but God also promises that His Word does not return empty, but always accomplishes the purpose for which He sent it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments