>Metro North Run Around

>Has anybody ever tried to call the police about a non-emergent matter? It’s next to impossible to get through the layers of bureaucracy. Here’s what I’ve been through:

My insurance company told me that I need to get the accident report amended if we have any hope of winning our case in arbitration. I called the officer who filled out the report and left three messages in two weeks. He never called back. So I called to speak with a supervisor. “It’s after 2pm,” they told me. “You need to call back tomorrow between 0500 and 0515 to talk to one of them. Or you can call after 0530 and leave a message with dispatch, and they will have a day shift supervisor call you.”

I called this morning at 0530. “you need to call back after 0615.”

I called at 0625. I confirmed that the man on the phone was a “day shift supervisor.” He gave me his name, and then told me, “We are all civilians here in communications. I don’t know what happened to your messages. The only thing we can do in communications is to page the officer.” He then took my name and number, confirmed that the officer was working “later on today,” and told me he would have the officer call me.

Now I sit and wait for this guy to call me. I thought I was going to speak with his supervisor (a policeman who was superior to him) and instead I got a civilian who just passes messages along. So after this two week long process of trying to get in touch with this officer, I am right back where I was the first time I tried to talk to him: giving someone a message for him to cal me. This is really starting to get frustrating.

If he doesn’t call me today, I am going to get very upset. I guess I will then move up the chain again. Maybe the supervisor of the supervisor is someone who can help me.

Posted in accident, motorcycle | Leave a comment

>Motorcycle Finale

>

So by now you have probably both heard that the insurance company totaled my motorcycle. Scratch that. Mr. Blind Bartimaeus totaled my motorcycle. My insurance company just informed me Friday that this was the case. They paid off the balance of my loan, and gave me a check for $250, and now I have no more motorcycle.

If I can convince the police to amend the accident report based on the physical evidence and MY testimony (instead of solely using the other guy’s testimony for the accident report), then I might possibly get my $500 deductible back. I spoke with a member of my church yesterday who is a police officer, and he told me to take this all the way to the top, if need be.

Hey, I just remembered: Governor Mitch Daniels is a biker (see above photo of the Governor on his bike). Maybe I could call in a few favors… Naaah. I hope to get this resolved before it ever got that far.

Kim and I have decided that a new motorcycle will have to wait for now. The earliest that I would buy one would be after we get back from Family Camp at Northland (June 8th-13th, for those of you wishing to steal our dog and all our webkinz while we are away, hint, hint). I will probably wait until after I get back from my brother’s Tiger Cruise in July before I start seriously looking. It is entirely possible that I won’t buy one until next year. I do know that if I haven’t found a good bike for cheap by the end of August, I’m not going to buy one until next spring. We’ll just have to see what God does.

In the mean time, it’s back to the silver beast (my ’02 Grand Am 4 banger) that only gets 20mpg. Ah well. It needs a new driver’s seat, and my wife informed me that the button on the gearshift lever falls out at times. Hmmm. This is the only vehicle we have that hasn’t been “totaled” in the past six months.

Trifecta, anyone?
Posted in accident, motorcycle | Leave a comment

>Accident Update

>I talked to the insurance companies at length yesterday morning. The other guy’s insurance company says that they believe their driver, who states that I was in the right lane. They point out that his account matches what the accident report says. The “investigating officer” wrote in his police report,

“Both drivers were east on 96th St towards Meridian St. Driver #1 was
in the right lane, Driver #2 was coming up in the left lane. Driver #1 did
not see driver #2 in the left lane and moved over into the lane, striking each
other. Minor damage and no injuries.”

The report specifies me as driver #1.

So basically the officer is saying that I was in the right lane and moved into the left lane where the other guy was innocently driving in full compliance with the law, causing him to run into me. I want to talk to this officer, and here is what I want to ask him:

How did you determine who was in what lane? I only told you that he was to the left of me. I was in the right hand side of the left lane. Is there any way we can amend the report, because there is no way we can state who was in what lane, without looking at physical evidence. The pictures that I took show that my motorcycle went down on the left side of the left lane, which would be impossible if I had come from the right lane. I didn’t get a chance to move more than a foot or two before being struck. The only witnesses we have to the accident are me and the other driver.

I get the feeling that the officer is not going to amend or change the report in the same way that a baseball umpire will not change his calls at the plate, no matter how wrong they may be: he has spoken, and it must therefore be so. But if they are going to take this stand, I would like them to explain to me how my motorcycle ended up facing forward so far over in the left hand lane, if I supposedly started in the right hand lane.

Another thing: The guy told me that he didn’t see me. If he didn’t see me, then I am the only reliable witness who can state where I was. I say I was in the left lane. That should be the end of that, right?

I have been told that if State Farm agrees with my version, and therefore disagrees with Liberty Mutual’s version, this will all go to “arbitration.” From what I understand, I have nothing to do with that, and I don’t get the chance to defend myself. Correct me if I am wrong.

I get the feeling that this will not be over for some time.

Posted in accident, motorcycle | Leave a comment

>The Death of Newspapers

>Yesterday Bob Kravitz (sports journalist extraordinaire for the Indianapolis Star) opened wide and stuck both feet in his mouth by calling out bloggers for not using their real names. He says that bloggers are not reliable and are, in fact, “weenies” for hiding behind nom de plumes. This got me thinking. I have never been to journalism school. I took English in college, as well as some creative writing courses. Sometimes I write great stuff that makes people laugh, and sometimes I have trouble stringing a sentence together. This is why I don’t get paid for my writing. Perhaps someday I might write a book, but it would not be something I write overnight. But I digress.

If I remember correctly, newspapers began with the invention of the printing press, and during Revolutionary War times, newspapers were printed in people’s houses and were not the big corporate entities like we have today. The papers that did well did so because their writing was good and their facts were reliable. People bought those papers instead of the ones that were bad and untrustworthy. This is how competition works.

When a newspaper fails, it does so for one of several minor reasons, but the main reason is almost always the same thing: the readers went elsewhere for their information. I used to subscribe to the Des Moines Register, even when I didn’t agree with their slant on things, because it was the only game in town if I wanted information that didn’t come off the local TV news. This was back in the 80’s and early 90’s.

When I moved to Indianapolis, I got the Indy Star. I enjoyed the Star, but eventually it came down to the fact that I am a busy person, and I never had time to read the Star. I do have time to read 18to88, stampedeblue, bleedcubbieblue, foxnews, directorblue and several others, for my sources of information. I also wander past indystar.com from time to time to see if there’s any local news that’s interesting. Since I’m not from here, most of the news doesn’t affect me.

I still get the Star, but just on Sundays. Why? Because the $1.50 per week is worth it, given the several dollars in coupons I get. If they stopped carrying coupons, I would cancel even that subscription. Why is it that I don’t subscribe to the daily paper? The same reason that I don’t pay for natural gas: I don’t need it. My house isn’t set up for it, and I never use it. If I got a bill in the mail from the gas company, I would not pay it, since they don’t provide a service for me.

My final point goes back to the idea of competition I brought up in paragraph two. If the Indianapolis Star (and Bob Kravitz) go under and cease operations, it will be because people have stopped using them as the credible, reliable, first line news source that they are supposed to be. Newspapers were great fifty years ago. They were great thirty years ago, but I don’t know how relevant a news outlet can be when they only produce one edition every 24 hours. News sites on the internet can update minute by minute. Fifty years ago, people read the newspaper to find out what happened yesterday. If you pick up a newspaper today, you will find out what happened. Yesterday. You can go to any news website (or turn on CNN or Fox News Channel) and find out what is happening RIGHT NOW.

Do I find it ironic that I am writing this article about something that happened yesterday? Yes. But I am writing it now, and you are reading it now.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment